Azara Blog: PCBs and male fertility

Blog home page | Blog archive

Google   Bookmark and Share

Date published: 2005/10/13

The BBC says:

Pollutant chemicals called PCBs damage sperm but do not appear to have a dramatic impact on male fertility, scientists say.

However, they warn damage from PCBs could be enough to render infertile men whose sperm is already of less than optimum quality.

The synthetic organic pollutants are found widely in the environment.

Details of the pan-European study, which tested the sperm of 700 men, appear in Human Reproduction journal.

The study examined the effects of pollutants on men from four different places - some from Warsaw in Poland, some from Kharkiv in Ukraine, some Inuits from Greenland and some fishermen from Sweden.

Sperm samples were analysed for evidence of genetic damage and blood tests were carried out to determine the level of PCB exposure.

The results showed that among the European men overall, genetic damage to the sperm rose in concert to exposure to PCBs.

However, no such association was found among the Inuit group.

Overall, around 10% of sperm DNA was damaged on average and the large majority of men in the study were fertile.

The probability of fathering a child starts to decrease when the proportion of damaged sperm reaches about 20% and becomes negligible from 30-40% onwards.

Lead researcher Dr Marcello Spanó said: "PCB exposure might negatively impact reproductive capabilities especially for men who, for other reasons, already have a higher fraction of defective sperm."

Dr Spanó said the results suggested that something in the Inuit group's genetic make-up, or something about their lifestyle, might help to neutralise or counterbalance the damaging effects of PCB exposure.

However, he admitted the study was limited as there was no way the researchers could fully tease out the effect of each of the 200 closely related substances in the PCB family.

Hmmm, when you live in a polluted environment there are lots of pollutants, not just PCBs. They only seem to have studied PCBs, could one or more of the other pollutants be the main cause of the problem? It certainly seems suspicious that the Inuit had different results. The only way to do this study properly is to take two randomly chosen groups of men, expose one of the groups to extra PCBs and see what the difference is. Needless to say that study will never be done (on humans).

All material not included from other sources is copyright For further information or questions email: info [at] cambridge2000 [dot] com (replace "[at]" with "@" and "[dot]" with ".").