Azara Blog: Yet another CO2 sea-bed storage proposal

Blog home page | Blog archive

Google   Bookmark and Share

Date published: 2006/08/08

The BBC says:

Storing carbon dioxide under the sea-bed could help to reduce global warming, according to US scientists.

The proposals involve pumping the gas miles underground then injecting it under the sea floor.

There is enough space for almost unlimited carbon emissions, a US team reports in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Previous plans to store carbon under the sea have drawn criticism because of concerns over leakage and safety.

Supporters of the latest idea say that it overcomes these drawbacks and can be done with existing technology.

Previous suggestions for tackling rising carbon emissions by removing the gas from the atmosphere and storing it underground include:

But these methods have raised concerns, notably the risk of leakage from geological storage sites, and fears that C02 dissolved in large quantities in the ocean might harm marine ecosystems.

The latest idea involves pumping carbon dioxide gas down to a depth of 3,000m (1.86 miles) and injecting it below the sea floor.

The high pressure and the low temperatures would turn the carbon gas into a liquid that is denser than the water around it, says a joint Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Columbia University team.

Experiments suggest that ice-like compounds would be formed in which the water molecules act like cages, trapping the carbon dioxide molecules within.

According to the researchers, this would ensure that the gas remains trapped in the sediment and would be secure enough to withstand even the most severe earthquakes.

"Deep-sea sediments at high pressure and low temperature provide a virtually unlimited and permanent reservoir for carbon dioxide captured from fossil fuel combustion," they write in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

"...We propose that CO2 storage in deep-sea sediments at high temperatures and low temperatures be considered along with other options."

The storage capacity is enormous, they add. In the US alone, annual emissions of carbon dioxide could be contained in just 80 square kilometres (31 square miles) of seafloor.

Some kind of CO2 storage is almost certainly going to be part of the "solution" to CO2 emissions. But only time will tell whether this specific variant is a resonable alternative. And it's always easy to bandy around statements such as that the "storage capacity is enormous". That is only one consideration. There is also the question of cost and environmental impact. Of course so-called environmentalists do not like technologies such as carbon storage, because they do not like the idea that "business as usual" is an option.

All material not included from other sources is copyright For further information or questions email: info [at] cambridge2000 [dot] com (replace "[at]" with "@" and "[dot]" with ".").