Azara Blog: UK Chief Scientist recommends a badger cull

Blog home page | Blog archive

Google   Bookmark and Share
 

Date published: 2007/10/22

The BBC says:

The UK government's chief scientist has advised ministers that badgers should be killed to prevent the spread of TB among cattle.

Sir David King says culling could be effective in areas that are contained, for example, by the sea or motorways.

His report follows a previous study that said culling badgers would be ineffective.

The Independent Scientific Group found that targeting one site would only cause badgers to flee to other farms.
...
Sir David said: "Together with five well-respected experts, I have assessed the ISG report and other research relating to badgers and TB in cattle.

"It is clear that badgers are a continuing source of infection for cattle and could account for 40% of cattle breakdowns in some areas.

"Cattle controls remain essential but I consider that, in certain circumstances and under strict conditions, badger removal can reduce the overall incidence of TB in cattle."

About 2,500 cattle a year get bovine tuberculosis (bTB), and some 30,000 stock are killed every year because of the disease, according to the National Farmers' Union.

The union also believes a cull is necessary to curb TB in cattle.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the issue was "extremely difficult".

It was committed to "evidence-based policy decisions" but no decisions were imminent, it said.

The Independent Scientific Group (ISG) assessed the results of a nine-year experiment to discover whether killing badgers would stem the spread of disease.

Its findings, published in June, said badgers did play a role in the spread of bTB.

However, it warned that the culling would have to be so extensive it would be uneconomical.

It found that although TB infection dropped in the immediate area of the cull, it increased on adjoining farms, in effect shifting rather than solving the problem.

Professor John Bourne, author of the ISG report, said Sir David's recommendations were not consistent with the scientific findings of his report but were "consistent with the political need to do something about it".

"If you wish to go down the culling route, you have to do what the Irish are doing in large parts of their country and that is eliminate," he added.
...
While most cattle farmers may support a cull, it would prove unpopular with the public.

A government consultation of more than 47,000 people found that more than 95% of people were opposed to the idea.

You would not want to be the person who has to make this decision. The ISG analysis seems pretty sensible, but farmers are a powerful lobby, even with the Labour government. The anti-culling figure quoted from the government consultation with the "public" is a bit meaningless since these consultations are dominated by the academic middle class, and of course the academic middle class love badgers. But any culling decision would certainly cause a certain amount of antagonism towards the government. And if the ISG analysis is correct, culling is not a very useful approach.

_________________________________________________________
All material not included from other sources is copyright cambridge2000.com. For further information or questions email: info [at] cambridge2000 [dot] com (replace "[at]" with "@" and "[dot]" with ".").